One of the filters that can be easily tackled is the filter on identical link anchor text on all incoming links. Failure in this area makes it obvious to the search engine spiders that the anchor text is not generated naturally rather created artificially. Spiders recognize that your anchor text link is trying to be manipulative to gain higher Google pagerank and link popularity.
The solution to this filter lies in fairly open books, all you have to do is to bring in variety and mix up your anchor text wordings. Variation in keywords and site title should easily lead you out of this problem. Your wording should not use more than a maximum of 80% of your regular link text and should include at least 20% of substitute text.
Bringing in variety in your anchor link text will make bring in proven benefits. It will also show the presence of a wide range of incoming links that can possibly add up to your backlink counts and hence search engine rankings.
Links.htm natured pages seem to play a certain significant role in triggering filters of its own. Normally these links.htm pages that virtually contain all the outgoing links of a site seem not to be given any credit by search engines neither for their own pagerank nor for backlink credit for their linking partners. It not only gain any credit it also triggers a filter that will penalize your site.
One of the efficient ways of getting over this problem is to rename your links with entirely different names and completely avoid using the word "links" in your naming. Another effective way is to thematically segregate all the available links and distribute them among various pages of your site. Third way to go about this problem is to provide brief description of each link and its thematic relation to your site.
There is some evidential fear that reciprocal links bring in the peril of Google filters. But SEO professional rule out this fear as unsubstantiated fear as blogs that is packed with reciprocal links seemingly does not suffer any such ill effects or problems on backlink totals or loss of pagerank.
Whether it is true or not one will be on the safer side by keeping a positive ratio of incoming one-way links. Blogs certainly employ this technique and does not give a second thought on reducing their reciprocal link density.
It has been observed that cross linking between too many sites within the same server in particular when it belongs to the same c level block. By 'c level block' it has to understood that it is the third section of the website address.
Eg: 123.123xxx.123.xxx
A speculative value posed seems to be 20, that is when the number of linked sites crosses the threshold of 20 it is believed that it activates a filter. However, the figure posed is just a speculation and is not based on any proven statistics.
The obvious solution to this problem is to avoid reciprocal linking with many sites that have a common host. Best linking pattern seems to be triangular linking pattern, link A to B, B to C and link back C to A. All the other linking patterns have proven to be fatal. All that is needed here is exercise of little caution. |